• zaphod@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    They couldnt give a rats ass about peedtrians

    Apparently in this case the pedestrian infrastructure is explicitly also there for bicycles. Mixing bicycles and pedestrians is not a good idea. OP calls this “good infrastructure” in the title. It would be good infrastructure, if the bicycles had their own lane, there clearly is enough space for that.

    • Panini@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      In low density areas that don’t see a huge amount of either traffic, there’s no reason not to mix them. It works just fine in plenty of places.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      mixing bicycles and pedestrians is perfectly fine, you only get problems when people don’t have anywhere to bike quickly.

      Most cyclists are happy to go 15km/h or slower, which works flawlessly with pedestrians so long as volumes of either aren’t huge. But there’s always some percentage of cyclists who want/need to go 20+km/h, which is only acceptable if there’s barely any traffic at all.

      Frankly it can be really nice to mix slow cyclists and pedestrians, because it means more opportunity for people to talk to each other. I have several times met people i know while on my bike, and because my city at most separates cyclists from pedestrians with paint it means i can just stop and have a chat with them, it just feels nice.

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s fine as long as the cyclists aren’t fast and there’s enough space.