• blackbelt352@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s not a counterexample, thats JAQing Off and your JAQoff is a false dichotomy. The form information takes and the information itself are not the same. If I make a video about how G is Grab in Blender, and then write an article about how G is Grab in Blender, and then make an audio recording about how G is Grab in Blender, and then I make a pictogram about how G is Grab in Blender, and then create an interpretive dance about how G is Grab in Blender, they all look different but are communicating the same piece of information: that G is Grab in Blender.

    The forms are different, the information is the same. AI doesn’t do that. It predicts tokens of what is most likely without any understanding of the concept.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The form information takes and the information itself are not the same.

      Like that dance, your imagination is also a representation and not the information itself, which makes it subject to the random processes that happen in your brain.

      • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        My imagination has nothing to do with the reality that G is Grab in Blender. Maybe reality is a collective hallucination, but that doesn’t matter because we don’t behave like it is. Knock off the pseudoprofound sophistry.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Your imagination about the Blender G comes from biological processes that have stored an imperfect representation of the fact in your mind. Those processes are not the same as the ones AI uses but they are also random. Randomness itself shouldn’t be a reason to distrust an AI.