• Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    I love the Adirondacks, but they’re not mountains.

    They were when life first started, but not anymore.

    Mt Washington is a mountain tho.

    • JayDee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      What angle are you coming at from? As a viewer of mountains? As a hiker? As a Rock climber? Like, what criteria are we viewing this comparison through?

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        Mountain-ness. Despite not even being 2 km, Mt Washington’s prominence, weather, view, etc all make it more like a mountain, while “mt” Marcy, you can hike in like 3 hours and it’s mostly gradual forest trail.

        Washington fills the social role of a mountain, it’s something you prepare to hike, bring a bag with food and water and a heavy jacket, maybe even microspikes, you check the weather to make sure you’re not going to get swept away by 200+ mph gusts, you leave at daybreak so you don’t get caught by night during descent, you get to the top and say “This is definitely a mountain”, any Adirondack, you walk up casually with zero preparation , not even water and that’s it. Maybe you check for avalanche warnings if it’s winter.