• Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Do you think that the city should engage a – civil engineering project to build a pedestrian bridge over a navigable canal?

    Uhmm? Yes? Have you somehow missed that there’s a stadium on the other side of the canal? There are a lot of things in the southwest corner of the map, not just one hotel. I do not believe there’s any other country on this planet where this is even a question. That bridge would absolutely get built. Building the stadium cost a big sum of money. A simple pedestrian bridge costs something like 50 000 $, maybe 200 000 $ if you want a fancy one. How would it not be possible for the stadium to pay that? It’s an increase of about one percent to the project’s expenses.

    And if they somehow forgot to include the necessary traffic connections in requirements for giving the permission to build the stadium, then I can assure you that the state is able to pay for a hundred grand for simple infrastructure.

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, there are plenty of countries on earth that don’t pave over their rivers so that you can build a business wherever you want without obstruction. What a stupid fucking notion.

      • Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sorry, I understand each word you wrote, but not really their meaning. Would you be able to paraphrase, please?

        • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Geographic obstacles exist in other countries too. No country on earth removes every geographic obstacle to create a shortest possible-straight line walking path between every structure that exists. The idea that literally anyone would do this is absurd.

          • Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I know it’s absurd.

            Why did you bring that absurd idea up in this comment of yours?

    • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Here’s the thing, that bridge would only serve tourists customers of the hotel, not the tax payers of NJ who would be paying for it. So it’s on the hotel here to advocate for their customers and either work with NJDOT for the bridge or run a shuttle. But they put up the sign instead because their only care about their bare minimum liability, not making things safe or convenient.