Because we all know that making something they dislike illegal stops it from happening and makes everyone safer 🫠

  • Rhonda Sandtits@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    21 hours ago

    a sex worker exclusionary radical feminist (SWERF) NGO called U.K. Feminista

    Uggghhh.
    Bunch of weirdos pretending they aim to protect women/girls from losers like Jack Doherty and Andrew Tate who run violent, exploitative onlyfans webcam mills.
    But their actual goal is to criminalise porn of any kind.

  • TWeaK@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Law enforcement and organisations with designated regulatory powers and functions must be able to access all content hosted and streamed by pornography platforms for investigative and enforcement purposes,” notes another recommendation.

    Lmfao so the true purpose is free porn for cops.

  • whatthey@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is going to need some seeeerious explaining.

    These sites now all need some form of ID to access so what is wrong with a contract between two adult people to supply video on demand of a consenting adult, so much of the ‘for the kids’ argument goes out the window.

    By saying it’s all ‘pimping’ and sex exploitation, you’re effectively bracketing the entire internet sex work into Tracy Gilberts vision in the hopes of tarnishing everyone either perverts or deviants.

    This really need some pushback.

    And since we’re talking about perverts and deviants, there some sick webcam filth out there which is still LEGALLY AVAILABLE to buy, but you do fuck all about this…

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can’t sit on faces, can’t cam, how’s a woman supposed to have fun in the UK then?

    Fr fuck british puritainism

  • sexy_peach@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 days ago

    Anyone know why the UK is going in this direction? Arresting Palestine protestors and puritanical laws against pornography?

    Is this some leftover from colonial times but now it hits the local poors?

    • als@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think Labour are trying to win Conservative and Reform voters, but in doing so are just pushing away anyone who might have voted for them.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Labour has always had an authoritarian/nanny-state streak; it’s not really about temporary political advantage. And the general public is also fairly illiberal, unfortunately - the porn bans and age checks are fairly popular.

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Labour have always been a bit more puritanical “for the greater good”. The Palestine Action thing is a bit more complicated because the proscription process is not exactly transparent. However there are plenty of other pro-palestine groups you can support. The people getting arrested are doing it to make a point about the proscription.

      • waz@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The Palestine people’s front? Fuck off! We’re the people’s front of Palestine!

        I thought we were the popular front Reg?

        People’s front!

        Whatever happened to the popular front?

        That’s him over there, splitter!!

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Games Workshop:

    Ok, so the forces of Slaanesh have dissapeared into the chaos gates and are completely lost forever.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I see so many negative responses to this law but it kinda sounds like e-pimping should be illegal. I mean I believe in the legalization of prostitution but I feel it needs many regulations to prevent pimping.

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It depends if you consider the OnlyFans website as the e-pimp. As I understand it a lot of the performers like OnlyFans because it gives them a safe way to monetise their performance and get paid directly without pimps being involved. The cut the website takes is 20% which is less than most mobile app stores.