“tHe PrOgReSs hAs bEeN iNsAnE”

    • joeschmoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      Yep, and if there’s no .md or co-author, I’ll check the first commit and that will usually expose them.

      Anyone, who actually already has some experience in developing software and takes on a serious project on their own, doesn’t just start using git at already 50k lines in. All slop projects, I’ve seen thus far, have like 20k - 50k lines in their first commit, or, in case of this super hyped (totally natural hype, btw) KytyPS5 - 200,000. Yes, TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND, in their first commit. Like how do you only think about version control at already 200,000 lines in. Utterly incompetent. And remember, if they had just moved the remote (gitlab to gh, f.e.), the full git history would obviously be there.

      Now, ofc LLMs are gonna be way more competent than these people would, buuuuut, since these people have no fucking idea what code they are pushing, I am not trusting them, ever.

      • Scott🇨🇦🏴‍☠️ @lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I will, thanks.

        Edit:

        Brave gets an F with 47 Claude or Copilot commits.

        Cake Wallet gets and A+ with 48 Claude commits.

        Notesnook is in S tier with 8 commits from Copilot.

        Not a fan of how they score.