New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani can’t be president, so he’s trying to be the next best thing: a progressive kingmaker for 2028.
Mamdani has been meeting privately with union leaders, urgently talking up the need for a labor-aligned or leftist candidate to run for the White House, four people familiar with the talks told Axios.
He’s arguing that progressives can’t afford to squander their midterm momentum.
Why it matters: Behind closed doors, Mamdani has made a striking admission that helps explain why he’s so eager to huddle with allies about 2028: He’s uncertain whether New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, his close political partner, will launch a White House run, the sources said.
If Ocasio-Cortez stays out of the 2028 race, it would upend the Democratic primary — and potentially leave the party’s insurgent left without a candidate.
Archive: https://t.co/YOEpYUhXiF
So when is going to stop supporting Hakeem Jefferies?
Publicly? Once he’s no longer speaker. Privately? Never has.
Y’all get real stupid when a politician does politics, huh? He could rock the boat publicly on Jeffries, but it’d eat up all his political capital and net him nothing in return. Which would also doom the DSA, since they’d be seen as nothing but a liability to both politicians and the general public.
He’s doing good work, sit on his neck about important things, like illegal Israel land sales in NYC and divesting from Israel. Don’t waste time on intraparty nonsense like this.
Nore centrism bullshit. You guys are so stupid to believe Hakeem will help dsa members accomplishing their promises. He literally voted for condemning socialism just after Mamdsni won.
Why do you want to transform politicians to could leaders qe could praise him when he does good things and criticize him when he does not
Criticize him on things that actually impact governance, not bullshit party shit. Yes, he was forced to endorse Jeffries, that doesn’t taint what he’s doing for NYC and the DSA
I know Jeffries is an obstacle and in no way sympathetic to the DSA or progressives writ large (thus why the DNC picked a black man for the position, so they can weaponize his identity). I think if Mamdani called him out, that obstacle becomes an insurmountable hurdle in NYC. Jeffries’ political base is inside Mamdani’s city, if he pissed him off it would eat up all his office’s resources just to deal with that. Thus he’d accomplish nothing, thus fucking over the DSA since he’s their poster child to the country.
Let’s be honest, most Americans are tragically uneducated about politics in general. I’ve seen people already blam8ng newly elected democrats for things happening right now in congress…thus blaming people who haven’t even been sworn yet. Things didn’t magically change overnight, so they’re saying the Dems failed to acknowledge the electorate’s mandates. Social media is awash in people’s political ignorance.
Schumer and Hakim has impact on governance and very bad one
Yeah, but not for the mayor of NYC. There are much better uses of his office than fighting bullshit political games with the pissed off hive of Jeffries’ fans he annoyed in the city for no immediate political gain. He could spend that time fixing potholes and showing New Yorkers the benefit of democratic socialism and functioning government. Things that have actual value besides assuaging the childish fears of keyboard warriors afraid that he’s lost his way cause he’s not bothering to pick a fight that helps basically no one.
You can’t be a king maker if you don’t listen to the base. No Hakeem is what the base want and would boost mamdani approval ever more
I’d wager to say that 60% of the base doesn’t even know the name Hakeem
Yeah, and you also can’t be a kingmaker if people view you as incompetent or incapable. If he spent all of his time and political capital (which is what it would cost) to endorse a different speaker, his days of accomplishing wins in NYC are over for the immediate future. That hurts him and the DSA more than a lukewarm endorsement he gave over a year ago, one that he doesn’t even bother to repeat nowadays (he says ‘you know where I stand on that matter’ rather than repeating his endorsement)
Not endorsing Hakeem would have changed nothing at all. He would still be able to do what he promised. Your logic reminds me of the recent post here about how dems should be focused on the economic promises and not impeach key figure of the criminal admin as if both canèt be done at the same time