• nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    21 hours ago

    There’s a chap in the comments suggesting to stop worrying, you only need to keep to the spec. The sheer stupidity of that… good god the stupidity.

    • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Another says that they should audit the AI code using AI. Basically saying lets wrap the blackbox with another blackbox but this time with markerpen writing on top of the blackbox.

      Idk how’s that supposed to help, i’m not a programmer, but i’d assume if Claude misunderstood the code that they themselves wrote, the project became unfixable, and they might have to see themselves writing the whole thing from the ground up.

    • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Reminds me of that company I was interviewing with back in May where the department lead proudly told me that all of their specs, code, docs and tests are now generated by LLMs.

      They were seeking a replacement for a lady that had suddenly left…

      • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They were seeking a replacement for a lady that had suddenly left…

        Let me guess: they’re completely at a loss how this happened so unexpectedly.

        I’m certain at some points only idiots have a job and the rest of us are jobless and homeless. Idiocracy.

        • KimLuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          That is literally now lol. It’s a cycle because stupid people are easily scared and poor people are quicker to anger. The stupid people think they are geniuses because when they ignore the smart people it feels like people are less mean to them.

      • nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        On a very basic level, it is indeed a description/definition of what your resulting code is supposed to do. The chap’s proposal is basically let ai read the spec and build the software. Tomorrow you find out it’s missing something so you only adapt the spec and let the ai build it from scratch. Now, it doesn’t take too much imagination to see where this can and absolutely will go wrong, and especially in what unknown and very interesting ways especially.

    • TheMcG@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      lol that comment caught my eye as well. On some level I’m telling myself it’s just really dry sarcasm. Because i mean it’s just so dumb.