• Patrikvo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    IMO art is just something “useless but pretty” that humans produce. I don’t think emotion is really a requirement. e.g. Mondrian painted lines and colored rectangles and it’s considered art but I don’t see much emotion in those works. In fact I’d say these represent the exact opposite of emotion: logic, order and rigidity.

    Defining arts is pointless as artists just love to break out of such definitions.

    • observes_depths@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Now you’ve entered the eternal debate about what is and isn’t art, but IMO if a human produced it without any emotion whatsoever (which might actually be impossible), then it’s just a design. Art is communication of emotion.