Opponents say [Washington state] voters were persuaded at least partly because the initiative and its boosters exploited deep-seated prejudices and misunderstandings about transgender people to erode their rights.
Opponents say [Washington state] voters were persuaded at least partly because the initiative and its boosters exploited deep-seated prejudices and misunderstandings about transgender people to erode their rights.
See here’s the thing. I don’t have to. I have a degree in Exercise Science. I know lean muscle mass percentage by weight is the best predictor for physical ability. So why these researchers conclude it isn’t without explanation is frankly entirely beyond me. I can’t find anything on why they concluded that way and it flies in the face of basically what I know and have studied. And when the conclusion doesn’t support the data like it does in that study I have to wonder what politically motivated reason there is for that.
You are rubbing shoulders with flat earthers and anti vaxxers. “Scientific concensus must be wrong because I said so. They tell me I’m wrong, but I know better. Why do they keep saying the Earth is round when I can see the flat ground? They must be politically motivated.” You’re doing the Dr. Oz, claiming that the anti-vaxxers have legitimate concerns that need to be seriously invesitgated and we really need to stop taking vaccines in the meantime because I’m a doctor so you can trust me over scientific consensus.
No actually I’m not, and this is my last comment since you’re too stupid to understand, clearly. Those researchers said lean muscle mass is not a predictor of athletic performance. That is not the scientific consensus of the field period. Their statement goes against science.