• Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That adage assumes you are rich. A poor person who represents themselves is just poor and a victim of the system.

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Increasingly so. Even the court-appointed solicitors are hugely overworked and underpaid, and often lose money on cases.

    • TWeaK@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Somewhat, but it also seems Mr Justice Jay is just an asshole to litigants in person - in direct contradiction to the rules he was supposed to follow.

      Mr Justice Jay does not have a good record of dealing with litigants-in-person. Two years later, in a different case, he behaved so poorly that the Court of Appeal and then the Supreme Court found that he’d bullied a litigant-in-person. The Supreme Court found that he had aimed a “barrage of hostility” at the litigant-in-person, and “harassed and intimidated him in ways which surely would never have occurred if the claimant had been represented”.

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Hes a prize dickhead in general. Other judges mock him in their appeals judgements. Utter cock.