• Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Recognize that corporations, and unions, want control of your health care to use as bargaining chips. That’s why it’s hard to get either side to let it out of corporate control.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’ve been organizing unions for years. I’ve never once met a union staffer that wanted private healthcare over public healthcare to maintain bargaining power. Unions bargain healthcare because we have to, not because it’s a bargaining chip. If private healthcare dies, that creates substantially more bargaining power for workers.

      • Manjushri@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yep. If employees (union or otherwise) aren’t beholden to their employer for health care then those employers have to offer better pay and benefits to get and keep good employees.

      • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Union staff are not the same people in leadership, especially among those deciding what candidates get donations or support.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The presidents of international unions are not the ones negotiating contracts. That would be the bargaining committee, and some staff from the union local.

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yep. They use it to keep you working. Do the math to see how far away you are from retirement if you weren’t saddled with healthcare premiums. It is bonkers that every single citizen is not in favor of it.