A court can’t just operate where it has no jurisdiction and the US, much like Russia and China are not in their Jurisdiction. Who in the ICC will hold a nuclear armed country accountable? Latin America and Europe? Same reason Putin will never go to the ICC.
Because you are simply wrong. You keep insisting a court can operate where it has no jurisdiction and they “don’t care” both things are 100% completely wrong and false. This isn’t secret knowledge this is why I am telling you, but you keep insisting provably false information.
They aren’t operating in America so they don’t need jurisdiction in America! The same way a court in New Zealand doesn’t need jurisdiction in Zimbabwe to try someone in hold your horses here… Fucking New Zealand! The Hague operates in the Netherlands and have jurisdiction in multiple signatory countries and again brace yourself… the fucking Netherlands you absolute brick skull.
YOU CANT HOLD SOMEONE FROM A COUNTRY THAT DOESN’T RECOGNIZE YOUR COURT FOR TRIAL. HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU. THE NETHERLANDS HAS NO RIGHT TO DETAIN AND PUT PEOPLE WHO DIDN’T AGREE TO THE TERMS OF A COURT IN TRIAL OR DETAIN THEM. THAT IS ILLEGAL. IF AN AMERICAN TRAVELS TO A COUNTRY UNDER THE ICC THEN THEY CAN BE TRIED BUT THE US, AS WELL AS RUSSIA AND CHINA FIERCELY REJECT THE COURTS AUTHORITY AND THE COURT CAN’T LEGALLY, OR OTHERWISE, STOP THE NATIONS RETRIEVAL OF THE PERSON. ARE YOU AN IDIOT?
Yes you can. Go to another country, commit a crime and tell them you don’t accept their jurisdiction. See what happens. Hell slap a prime minister and shit in his cereal I’m sure they’ll just say Okie dokie feel free to go home.
You’re being an idiot. There are multiple thousands of examples of foreign nationals tried in a county that is not their own.
Iirc we signed but didn’t ratify like a lot of things. That said the icc doesn’t care, if you’re brought before them they will try you if need be.
A court can’t just operate where it has no jurisdiction and the US, much like Russia and China are not in their Jurisdiction. Who in the ICC will hold a nuclear armed country accountable? Latin America and Europe? Same reason Putin will never go to the ICC.
It can, the results do not need to matter in the country the person is from because they aren’t in that country.
Yeah, no duh. We already went over this and I’m not sure why you’re not aware of that fact or seem to think you’re making a point.
Because you are simply wrong. You keep insisting a court can operate where it has no jurisdiction and they “don’t care” both things are 100% completely wrong and false. This isn’t secret knowledge this is why I am telling you, but you keep insisting provably false information.
They aren’t operating in America so they don’t need jurisdiction in America! The same way a court in New Zealand doesn’t need jurisdiction in Zimbabwe to try someone in hold your horses here… Fucking New Zealand! The Hague operates in the Netherlands and have jurisdiction in multiple signatory countries and again brace yourself… the fucking Netherlands you absolute brick skull.
YOU CANT HOLD SOMEONE FROM A COUNTRY THAT DOESN’T RECOGNIZE YOUR COURT FOR TRIAL. HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU. THE NETHERLANDS HAS NO RIGHT TO DETAIN AND PUT PEOPLE WHO DIDN’T AGREE TO THE TERMS OF A COURT IN TRIAL OR DETAIN THEM. THAT IS ILLEGAL. IF AN AMERICAN TRAVELS TO A COUNTRY UNDER THE ICC THEN THEY CAN BE TRIED BUT THE US, AS WELL AS RUSSIA AND CHINA FIERCELY REJECT THE COURTS AUTHORITY AND THE COURT CAN’T LEGALLY, OR OTHERWISE, STOP THE NATIONS RETRIEVAL OF THE PERSON. ARE YOU AN IDIOT?
Yes you can. Go to another country, commit a crime and tell them you don’t accept their jurisdiction. See what happens. Hell slap a prime minister and shit in his cereal I’m sure they’ll just say Okie dokie feel free to go home.
You’re being an idiot. There are multiple thousands of examples of foreign nationals tried in a county that is not their own.