Republicans routed as Democrats gain powerful new leverage over Trump for remainder of his presidency

Democrats have regained control of the US Senate, routing Republicans nationwide with historic victories that will give them powerful new leverage over Donald Trump for the remainder of his presidency.

Democrats will soon have the ability to hold up not just Trump’s legislative agenda, but also any appointments he makes to his cabinet or the federal judiciary – including the supreme court, where conservatives have a 6-3 majority.

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 day ago

    Most hilarious is that all the redone maps actually went Democrat.

    There was one stare where Republican government refused to redo maps, because they were afraid exactly this would happen. Guess they can say “told you so”.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s one of the down sides of gerrymandering. If the other side reaches a high enough level of turnout, it actually magnifies your loss.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The goal of gerrymandering is to create a greater number of “safe” districts. The tradeoff is sacrificing margin in each, which fundamentally doesn’t work if there’s a large enough turnout.

      Also, fuck the Supreme Court of Virginia.

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Gerrymandering creates a damn where you can lose a few points and keep all your seats, but if you lose a few more, the damn breaks and all the seats get washed away.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Exactly the opposite.

        Instead of winning one district by a lot and losing 2, you redraw the map to win all three by a little.

        The result isn’t more safe districts, it’s less.

        • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          to win three by a little

          Which means that if you miscalculate that “little”, you lose all 3. As the parent comment states.

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I hyperfocused on “maximizing” and “safe”. The concept of “safe” in the context of electoral districts has a real definition in political science. Which is probably exactly why they put it in quotes.

            It’s like calling a Chihuahua “big dog”.

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            OK yeah, it just really hits my eyes and ears strangely.

            Like that spinning ballerina silhouette… I really gotta squint and fold my brain to make her spin the other way kinda thing.

            you’re right though: those quotes do heavy lifing and in a specific direction.