• GaumBeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    They can run 100’s of scripts on a single page from every identity broker. They employ the best data scientists, to figure out every possible way.

    The impact of this is probably greatly reduced by anti-JS measures like NoScript. Some sites probably still bundle fingerprinting code into their own scripts, but the really big players contract that out to companies whose entire purpose is data-harvesting, and that’s easily defeated by denying scripts from outside domains

    • Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I liked the idea of noscript but, it just wasn’t practical to adjust it to every site which scripts should run and which shouldn’t

    • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      the really big players contract that out to companies whose entire purpose is data-harvesting

      For sure, blocking those scripts goes a LONG way. But that’ll only work until lots of ppl do it. If it ever catches on big, the Identity Brokers will adapt. They’ll integrate their shit into sites in ways that are hard or impossible to separate this easily without totally breaking the site you were trying to visit.

      IDK for sure, but I fear we could be living on borrowed time.