From betraying Ukraine and dispatching masked agents who killed Americans to deporting US citizens and pulling out of accords controlling climate change and Iranian nuclear weapons, the list of Donald Trump’s abuses is long and growing still longer, seemingly by the day.

Looking back decades from now, historians will see that at the top of this shameful list is Trump’s utter abuse of his pardon power. It started on the first day of his second term, when he pardoned more than 1,500 insurrectionists who, on 6 January 2021, had stormed the US Capitol.

More recently, as documented in astonishing accounts by the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and 60 Minutes, Trump has overseen a robust pardons market in which friends or relatives of criminals offer to pay millions for presidential clemency.

…

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Americans: is there anything stopping the next president from abolishing the pardon and retroactively nullifying any existing pardons?

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      The pardon power is directly in the Constitution. It would take an amendment to modify it. Amendments are hard to do, they need 2/3 of Congress and 3/4 of States on board.

      And if you want Conservatives to get on board, you get a Liberal to start abusing it. But most Liberals have too much integrity to do that…

      … So, maybe Gavin really is the man for the moment!

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can void a pardon that wasn’t legally issued.

        14A3 disqualified Trump from reelection. Now you just need to get that enforced and even his pardons in the second term can be eradicated

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, when the cons are questioning things like donnie having a third term, I think some Democrats should step into the WH and test it out. Arrest donnie and pals, and make them fight it out in the courts. Maybe deport them to CECOT in the interim and let them fight to have them brought back here.

      • Kirp123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Biden pardoned his son and a bunch of other people and the Republicans didn’t start going after the pardon power. So I don’t think they care even if a democrat misuses it.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Was it a misuse? I could totally see Trump and co going after the Bidens, for whatever.

          • Natanael@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            They tried and Trump got real mad about it because he wanted to drag them through the courts and with the pardon the courts wouldn’t comply

    • Ava@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, that’s a broad question. Personally? Practically? Politically? Constitutionally?

      Legally-speaking, this is not something the President can unilaterally do. Theoretically they could amend the Constitution to accomplish the former and allow for the latter, but the chances they could actually do so are next to nil.

      Could a President do it anyway? Well, maybe… It seems very unlikely that this would survive public scrutiny, and even the corruption-captured Courts would have a very difficult time trying to justify any of it under existing frameworks.

      The “retroactively” part would probably be a particularly difficult hurdle. The US Constitution has protections against Ex Post Facto criminalization, and revocation of pardons would almost certainly violate that principle. Ditching that protection would be wildly unpopular, since it would allow for things like passing a law that would, for example, having ever received an abortion in the past. Or, having ever so much as touched a firearm.