• NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    “Senate Democrats are united in our support for Abdul El-Sayed, because we know he will fight for the economic interests of working families in Michigan, unlike Mike Rogers, who is a tool of Donald Trump and billionaire donors,” [Chuck Schumer] said.

    For once Schumer is 100% right.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      As much as I don’t like Schumer he is as lukewarm as it gets which can be both good and bad. He does actually care about American interests for the most part.

    • whalesnrainbows@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      18 hours ago

      This coming from Schumer is honestly almost as shocking as Stevens choosing to completely burn her bridges with the Democratic Party.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          My Chinese room theory of politics: I don’t actually care whether anyone truly believes what they say. Words speak louder than thoughts and actions speak louder than words. As long as someone is useful as an implement to enacting progressive policy priorities, successful at shepherding legislation, and campaigns for the election of progressives, or can be strong-armed into doing the above three, I could not care less whether they actually believe in what they say.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            14 hours ago

            At the margin, sincere belief is still better. Which is to say, Schumer should still be replaced with an actual progressive/leftist/socialist at the earliest opportunity, regardless of how he tries to pivot to act like one. I’ll appreciate the cynical pivot in the interim, but that’s as far as it goes.