Something good coming out of AI, it seems.

  • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    As for local models if you want to maintain that DSv4.1, GLM-5.3-f, M-3.1, or ther ilk are not near frontier-level. Then, I guess you are allowed to be wrong.

    lol

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Qwen 3.8 27b is now on par with claud fable 5 acording to this benchmark local llms are only a few months behind frontier models and are capable of many things.

      • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Fable is rank 5, Qwen 3.8 (with nothing claiming it’s the reduced 27b one) is rank 29, fuck you are you talking about.

        • pineapple@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          That’s fable 5.1 I said fable 5. Also it seems like the link I sent wasn’t for the benchmark I meant to send. Try to find the one for code rather than agentic work. Qwen 3.8 27B scores 1590 while Claude fable 5 scores 1624 which is a very slim margin considering fable 5 was one of, if not the best model when it was released.