Your only logical conclusion then, since voters don’t vote how you want them to, is to demand a better candidate then Gavin Newsom. Anything other than that is you sponsoring fascism (again), because you know now, that both a) voters aren’t going to vote for a Gavin Newsom, and b) voters can’t be changed to vote how you think they should be.
You have a path to winning elections and you are choosing to take a path which is demonstrated to lose elections. I see idiots who think voter behavior will some how magically shift to their own personal interpretation of what “strategic” or “harm reduction” is taken to mean, and handing the elections to fascists time and time again by expecting voters to show up for a lessor evil.
Well if you were genuine in your intent to stop fascism, you would see addressing their single issues as the highest of priorities.
AND THIS is why we do not believe the genuineness of your claim. You don’t oppose fascism. Even within your own framework, your are inconsistent, because you aren’t looking to stop fascism, you are looking for an excuse not to try.
Its not a matter of what you think it would do. Voters didn’t agree with her supporting a genocide.
If you want different outcomes, YOU have to make different decisions. This is why the entire country has abandoned third-way centrism as anything other than an ideological wet fart: because it inevitably cuckolds its self to tyranny.
Thankfully, when given the choice, voters clearly DO know how to vote in their best interests. But thats the key, they have to be given an option which is genuinely in their interests, where supporting a genocide through taxpayer funding, is not.
But you chose to double down on the genocide with some Trump craziness on top. Why?
It was christal clear that Netanyahu would have carte blanche with Trump in power.
Your only logical conclusion then, since voters don’t vote how you want them to, is to demand a better candidate then Gavin Newsom. Anything other than that is you sponsoring fascism (again), because you know now, that both a) voters aren’t going to vote for a Gavin Newsom, and b) voters can’t be changed to vote how you think they should be.
Lefts will find reasons not to vote for anyone.
I see idiots talking about how AOC is too far right here constantly.
You have a path to winning elections and you are choosing to take a path which is demonstrated to lose elections. I see idiots who think voter behavior will some how magically shift to their own personal interpretation of what “strategic” or “harm reduction” is taken to mean, and handing the elections to fascists time and time again by expecting voters to show up for a lessor evil.
Those, because I oppose fascism, are the idiots.
Your life as a lessee must be truly awful to have made you this angry.
If you opposed fascism, you would have done anything to not make it happen. Now you do have a fascist government.
Removed by mod
I’ve had better conversations with brick walls than single issue voters.
Well if you were genuine in your intent to stop fascism, you would see addressing their single issues as the highest of priorities.
AND THIS is why we do not believe the genuineness of your claim. You don’t oppose fascism. Even within your own framework, your are inconsistent, because you aren’t looking to stop fascism, you are looking for an excuse not to try.
Voting Harris was the way to oppose fascism and now it’s voting democrat to give them majorities in the house and senate.
Hahahaha
Vote for the cop to oppose fascism, that’s pretty fucking funny
You guys are hopeless.
I think 'we" (socialists) are in fact full of hope
Its not a matter of what you think it would do. Voters didn’t agree with her supporting a genocide.
If you want different outcomes, YOU have to make different decisions. This is why the entire country has abandoned third-way centrism as anything other than an ideological wet fart: because it inevitably cuckolds its self to tyranny.
Thankfully, when given the choice, voters clearly DO know how to vote in their best interests. But thats the key, they have to be given an option which is genuinely in their interests, where supporting a genocide through taxpayer funding, is not.
But you chose to double down on the genocide with some Trump craziness on top. Why? It was christal clear that Netanyahu would have carte blanche with Trump in power.
Removed by mod
Voters chose to accelerate the genocides though so your argument is fundamentally flawed.