• NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s entirely possible that the geniuses in charge of DHS had a totally insecure master admin password and security policy that allowed access to Okta management. The front door lock can still be called “secure” if the owner just left the back door open.

    • anewfox@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      if okta has a halfway decent IT department, they’d be able to find that. it’d be the one non-DHS IP address in their access logs.

    • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      So someone with a master password was phished. That doesn’t really make it insecure. Someone had admin rights and they were stupid enough to be phished.

      You can’t fix stupid

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        You can’t fix stupid, but you can build systems to help mitigate it. Rate limiting, alarms/pattern monitoring etc. unsurprisingly the fascists are too stupid to do any of that, even with their infinite corrupt budget.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The front door lock can still be called “secure” if the owner just left the back door open.

      That’d not even a back door. That’s just them leaving the key to the front door under a doormat.

    • morriscox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      True. When I was a network administrator I didn’t consider my network to be secure and I don’t trust my home network to be. I do what is feasible and hope that things work out.