• TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Sure, theoretically, but when you have a population where 35-40% want to watch the world burn or are too stupid to know the difference between that and “freedom”, versus 60% of the population who want to see things improve, Are you really okay with that 60% splitting 30/30, leaving the other 35 to 40% winning the day?

    Yeah… So which 30% are you blaming on losing? Each one is making a choice, why are you only blaming the left instead of the centrist who are going to do half the stupid shit the 35-40% were planning to anyways?

    • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not blaming nyone. I’m pointing out the folly of splitting the vote in this particular electoral system. if one must go point a finger, then it would be anyone who does not like their party’s choice and decides to run themselves as independents. they basically increase thr likelyhiod their party will lose if they actually convince people to vote for them.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not blaming nyone

        I mean based on the context of your first statement I find that hard to believe.

        if one must go point a finger, then it would be anyone who does not like their party’s choice and decides to run themselves as independents.

        Which is not what anyone on this thread was discussing?