It basically means “capable of experiencing feelings”
You don’t honestly believe that the plausibilistic text generator is capable of experiencing feelings or emotions do you?
You know what an LLM will do if you spin one up, (bringing it “to life” in your warped perceptions) and then don’t prompt it?
Fucking nothing, because it’s software. Shitty software at that.
Try it at home if you don’t believe me, just try not to forget to breathe while your mind is occupied.
sentience noun
1: a sentient quality or state
2: feeling or sensation as distinguished from perception and thought
What… is this a joke? These are so non-specific and generic. With this as criteria you could argue for anything being sentient, and nothing being sentient. This is useless.
Ahh, so you find the use of the root word of sentience to be non-specific?
I’m not sure if you know this, but on the internet dictionary, you can click on the other blue words if you don’t understand them, and it will show you their definitions too!
Then you just have to mentally concatenate the knowledge. I’ll help walk you through it this time. The root word you need help with is “sentient” (at least I think that’s the whole of it, but if you also don’t understand any of the other words in that definition just let me know and I’ll break them down).
Capable of sensing or feeling: concious of or responsive to the sensations of seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling, or feeling
Aware
Finely sensitive in perception or feeling
So that means sentience (noun) is:
A quality or state of being able to feel, or perceive feeling
Feeling or sesation as distinguished from perception and thought
Ok, so now, do you think that the slop generation software program is able to feel? Do you think the software program is aware? Do you think the software program is finely sensitive in perception or feeling?
Follow up question, Do you have any foundational conception of what a computer is, or what software does?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sentience
It basically means “capable of experiencing feelings”
You don’t honestly believe that the plausibilistic text generator is capable of experiencing feelings or emotions do you?
You know what an LLM will do if you spin one up, (bringing it “to life” in your warped perceptions) and then don’t prompt it? Fucking nothing, because it’s software. Shitty software at that.
Try it at home if you don’t believe me, just try not to forget to breathe while your mind is occupied.
What… is this a joke? These are so non-specific and generic. With this as criteria you could argue for anything being sentient, and nothing being sentient. This is useless.
Ahh, so you find the use of the root word of sentience to be non-specific?
I’m not sure if you know this, but on the internet dictionary, you can click on the other blue words if you don’t understand them, and it will show you their definitions too!
Then you just have to mentally concatenate the knowledge. I’ll help walk you through it this time. The root word you need help with is “sentient” (at least I think that’s the whole of it, but if you also don’t understand any of the other words in that definition just let me know and I’ll break them down).
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sentient
Sentient (adjective) -
Capable of sensing or feeling: concious of or responsive to the sensations of seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling, or feeling
Aware
Finely sensitive in perception or feeling
So that means sentience (noun) is:
A quality or state of being able to feel, or perceive feeling
Feeling or sesation as distinguished from perception and thought
Ok, so now, do you think that the slop generation software program is able to feel? Do you think the software program is aware? Do you think the software program is finely sensitive in perception or feeling?
Follow up question, Do you have any foundational conception of what a computer is, or what software does?