President Donald Trump declined to endorse Vice President JD Vance for the 2028 presidential election during a press briefing in Ireland

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    In case you forgot, that wasn’t a hypothetical. It actually occurred during Obama’s admin. Enough people thought “yea that sounds right” to the point that there wasn’t even a procedural change in SCOTUS selection.

    Christmas decorations being up early is one thing. Talking about electoral politics is an entirely different thing, that actually has consequences. People tune out of politics all together because we talk about elections years before they actually happen.

    Both parties absolutely love that we spend all our time with politics discussing elections, because all they do day in and day out is fundraise for their parties. Assuming that they never eat or sleep, politicians in both parties have less than 30 seconds to review bills before they vote on them, because of all the fundraising they do. The constant electoralism means that they never have to change.

    • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      In case you forgot, that wasn’t a hypothetical. It actually occurred during Obama’s admin. Enough people thought “yea that sounds right” to the point that there wasn’t even a procedural change in SCOTUS selection

      And then one of those ghouls, Barrett? was sworn in like 2 weeks before an election when it suited their needs.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yes, I know. Mitch did that one too, and has to do with Mitch weaponizing the fact that people tune out of politics because of constant electoralism. It’s not just Mitch, it’s not just Republicans, it’s the underlying system. Part of that underlying system is constant electoralism.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            My thesis is that electoralism is so constant that enough people agreed with him in 2016 to the point where no changes were made to SCOTUS selection, setting himself up to just do what he wanted. The Democratic party was pissed at both situations, but they saw fundraising opportunities instead of actually fucking doing something.

            • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              I read that situation as the republicans had the democrats in complete checkmate and just did what they wanted to do. They made up arguments on the fly to suit their needs, and I think they will continue to do that in the future. The US is a system in which there will be constant elections, so try not to get too twisted about that?

                • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  Ok but if the democrats had shoved Ginsburg out of her seat and rammed through a supreme court justice at whatever price (even via -gasp- hypocrisy), then the world would be a lot different now. So I kinda wish the rage went into electing effective motherfuckers.

                  • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    15 hours ago

                    My rage towards our socioeconomic capitalist system is being used to organize against the system, and I do vote for people I think will be effective.

                    I 100% agree that Ginsberg should have been pushed out, and I think Obama could have said that Congress elected not to perform their constitutional duty of providing advice and consent therefore he will be appointing the seat without them, rather than tweeting about it.

                    Edit: just noticed that the goalposts have moved from being about putting limits on election talk to implying that I don’t vote.