• h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So you don’t understand how the technology you’re defending functions then?

    • Slashme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “AI” is certainly environmentally damaging and dangerous, and if it isn’t given new input, it quickly starts generating absolute crap

      You see that as “defending” the technology?

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Do you disagree that the examples given are new knowledge? I’m sure OP is aware AI is “just a token generator” or whatever; that doesn’t really matter here when there is proof of it at least producing data in the convex hull of its training data, and in the case of alphago, with no training data at all.