what if
  • Communities
  • Create post
  • Create community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days ago

Texas’s Biggest County Shatters Early Voting Records

newrepublic.com

external-link
message-square
71
link
fedilink
257
external-link

Texas’s Biggest County Shatters Early Voting Records

newrepublic.com

inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days ago
message-square
71
link
fedilink
If Harris County is a sign, Republicans are in major trouble this election.
  • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Huh? This is a thread about the elections in Texas. What does Missouri have to do with anything?

    • Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think these comments are due to you saying you won’t vote. Is it possible you have a typo in your original post?

      • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Of course I’m not going to vote. Voting twice would be a crime.

        • Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Yes, that phrasing sounds weird. One would just say “I voted”

          • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Did you think I was just hanging out in the voting line for fun?

            • Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Look, I’m just pointing out why people are responding to you this way. If you want to be a snarky dick then ok. I’m out.

              • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                22 hours ago

                I’m trying to figure out why it wasn’t obvious I voted. The only explanation that makes sense to me is “I read the first few words and stopped and decided to reply anyways.” Pretty much every reply just repeated what I said but acts like I said the opposite. What’s the alternative reading?

                • Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  I assumed there was a typo somewhere and just couldn’t discern what was actually meant. It really does sound like you were just hanging out at the lines to gawp. No harm in changing the first line to make it more clear.

                  • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    19 hours ago

                    I generally oppose edits beyond minor typos (and you should leave an edit log if it was made more than a few seconds after posting). They make threads so much more confusing to follow, even if by simply clarifying the original confusing comment.

                • Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  This whole back and forth has been describing exactly that.

                  • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    21 hours ago

                    So far, only one person has referenced the fact that I was in the voting lines at all and that was after I made the comment that your comment is a reply to. I’ve had no reason to believe anyone else had even read more than half of what I said in the parent comment: most of the rest have been people saying vague things like “Sorry I didn’t realize you had a learning disability.”

    • NathanRanch@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sorry I didn’t realize you had a learning disability.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Are you able to explain what you meant such that someone like me could understand?

        • NathanRanch@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh sorry I had the learning disability.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.28K users / Day
  • 5.57K users / Week
  • 9.52K users / Month
  • 13.5K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 31.5K subscribers
  • 3.14K Posts
  • 51.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • UI: 0.19.17
  • BE: 0.19.20-modified
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org