It is a fallacious argument. Both 2D games and C are still used and have actually continued to evolve and progress in new creative directions. As for the third argument, it is pure hypocrisy. Tim doesnt contribute shit to the FOSS movement and actually has spoken against its core values from time to time.
He proceeded to list changes which gave good, astonishing results, where no art was stolen and no backlash happened.
Then he compared those changes to AI vibe coding? What results can he bring to the table for comparison?
It’s been years now, so let’s do a game and compare what years of 3d instead or 2d gave us, or the same with C++ instead of C.
It is a fallacious argument. Both 2D games and C are still used and have actually continued to evolve and progress in new creative directions. As for the third argument, it is pure hypocrisy. Tim doesnt contribute shit to the FOSS movement and actually has spoken against its core values from time to time.