The search warrant to raid a Washington Post reporter’s home shows how authorities can open your phone without your consent.

The recent federal raid on the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson isn’t merely an attack by the Trump administration on the free press. It’s also a warning to anyone with a smartphone.

Included in the search and seizure warrant for the raid on Natanson’s home is a section titled “Biometric Unlock,” which explicitly authorized law enforcement personnel to obtain Natanson’s phone and both hold the device in front of her face and to forcibly use her fingers to unlock it. In other words, a judge gave the FBI permission to attempt to bypass biometrics: the convenient shortcuts that let you unlock your phone by scanning your fingerprint or face.-

It is not clear if Natanson used biometric authentication on her devices, or if the law enforcement personnel attempted to use her face or fingers to unlock her devices. Natanson and the Washington Post did not respond to multiple requests for comment. The FBI declined to comment.

  • doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml
    0·
    4 days ago

    It’s easier if you think of it like a car. Say you get arrested while in or around your car: doesn’t mean you did anything wrong or broke a law, just that you were arrested. Now there’s a million ways for cops to do the backflip jetpack gymnastics to get to search your car.

    Once arrested, some stuff happens but importantly, a prosecutor starts building a case against you.

    Maybe you took the recycling out and a crumpled up beer can is in the back seat, that’s an open container. Maybe you picked up some starting fluid for the cold mornings, they found it in the glove compartment in a paper bag, better do that blood test on you to rule out inhalant use, that would give them dwi. Got a significant amount of cash in the locked center console, that’s drug money. Maybe you keep the sporterized bring back hunting rifle your uncle gave you in the trunk, now you have an unregistered firearm in your possession, intent to menace? How will that allow upgrading the charges they’re already building against you? Who can say?

    And remember, they’re going to use any method they can to deny you your property if you somehow end up beating the laundry list of charges. You’re losing the gun and cash no question. Civil asset forfeiture will see to that. If there’s anything wrong with your car that would keep it from passing inspection even if it had a valid inspection at the time of impound they can choose not to return it to you and instead sell it at auction for their own gain or just crush it.

    Now what lines and spirals are drawn in the cloud chamber of your life when that cop particle strikes your phone instead of your car?