What? The Nobel Committee is a fucking joke, and has been forever, and only sheep place any value in these politicians and rich people voting on the “peace prize.”
And while that all may help true, someone doing non-peace-promoting activities after they got the Peace Prize is just about the worst example you can use to defend that position.
How could that be true? People making war after getting the prize are cases in point, and the nobel committee has to answer it, or continue to have 0 credibility and only be respected by people that are ignorant or bad.
So your threshold is that they have to be able to see the intent of people’s hearts and predict the future? How would anyone succeed at those goals? How about not giving it to people who have directed no clear progress towards peace in the first place, like Barack Obama? That’s a much lower bar and reasonably achieved, and they haven’t even done that. They could also not give it to people until the results of their efforts, or at least the trends of their efforts regardless of results, we’re clear. That would still disqualify Obama, but also Ahmed.
He is case and point why the nobel committee eats oligarch dick.
It’s tricky, giving the prize, but a true leader will admit a mistake, and tell us how they will do better in the future, and the Nobel committee has not done that.
The lobotomy pioneer? Aby Ahmed? GTFO.
Are you saying he had even better examples with the very same person he used to defend his position about the Nobel Committe and didn’t?
What? The Nobel Committee is a fucking joke, and has been forever, and only sheep place any value in these politicians and rich people voting on the “peace prize.”
Fuck the Nobel Committee, they are garbage.
And while that all may help true, someone doing non-peace-promoting activities after they got the Peace Prize is just about the worst example you can use to defend that position.
How could that be true? People making war after getting the prize are cases in point, and the nobel committee has to answer it, or continue to have 0 credibility and only be respected by people that are ignorant or bad.
So your threshold is that they have to be able to see the intent of people’s hearts and predict the future? How would anyone succeed at those goals? How about not giving it to people who have directed no clear progress towards peace in the first place, like Barack Obama? That’s a much lower bar and reasonably achieved, and they haven’t even done that. They could also not give it to people until the results of their efforts, or at least the trends of their efforts regardless of results, we’re clear. That would still disqualify Obama, but also Ahmed.
Barak Obama was and is, a piece of fucking shit.
He is case and point why the nobel committee eats oligarch dick.
It’s tricky, giving the prize, but a true leader will admit a mistake, and tell us how they will do better in the future, and the Nobel committee has not done that.