All of the sources you linked are either terrible, particularly the eviloffice website, or cover relatively minor topics, like no remote file editing in the mobile OnlyOffice app.
The ‘dedicated website’ you linked provides straight up misinformation.
This is also why Russian developers are not allowed to maintain Linux kernel subsystems anymore.
This is incorrect, as per their own link inside this paragraph (https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/23/linus_torvalds_affirms_expulsion_of/). Nowhere does it state that Russian developers aren’t allowed to maintain Linux kernel subsystems. It only states that a bunch of maintainers associated with Russia were removed, and they may come back at some point in the future.
Another link is about one part of their FAQ which seems to conflict with the AGPL license. The license allows for removal of all permissions in any forks, but in the FAQ OnlyOffice claims you can’t. As mentioned by commenters under the linked posts, this is common and can just be ignored.
OnlyOffice may not be entirely open source and the company behind it may or may not be engaging in shady business. However, the sources here are just garbage and prove no points whatsoever.
Do not use open office: https://forum.cryptpad.org/d/232-onlyoffice-concerns-vendor-makes-shady-moves Dedicated website: https://eviloffice.tutdomen.com/ Licensing problems: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/9481/is-onlyoffice-restricting-our-freedom-with-their-faq-agpl-v3 (is not really open source?) and mobile clients going proprietary: https://www.reddit.com/r/NextCloud/comments/fktqug/onlyoffice_fcked_us/
Libre office are a project that comply with open source licenses instead of stealing the work
All of the sources you linked are either terrible, particularly the eviloffice website, or cover relatively minor topics, like no remote file editing in the mobile OnlyOffice app.
The ‘dedicated website’ you linked provides straight up misinformation.
This is incorrect, as per their own link inside this paragraph (https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/23/linus_torvalds_affirms_expulsion_of/). Nowhere does it state that Russian developers aren’t allowed to maintain Linux kernel subsystems. It only states that a bunch of maintainers associated with Russia were removed, and they may come back at some point in the future.
Another link is about one part of their FAQ which seems to conflict with the AGPL license. The license allows for removal of all permissions in any forks, but in the FAQ OnlyOffice claims you can’t. As mentioned by commenters under the linked posts, this is common and can just be ignored.
OnlyOffice may not be entirely open source and the company behind it may or may not be engaging in shady business. However, the sources here are just garbage and prove no points whatsoever.