Plenty of open source projects keep going on goodwill alone, with contributors putting in the hours and expecting nothing back. While others lean on outside support like cash, donated hardware, or someone else covering the hosting bill.
This kind of support rarely gets much attention, but these needs are some of the most foundational aspects of any project that’s serious about growing.
Gentoo falls in the second group. The source-based Linux distribution, built around the Portage package manager, runs largely on sponsored infrastructure, as it can only manage to maintain a few vital machines.
Sadly, many sponsors that had backed Gentoo all these years have decided to stop making contributions. The project is now looking for replacements and has put out a call for infrastructure sponsors.
Currently, its sponsors page lists names such as Oregon State University’s Open Source Lab, CDN77, HP, and Hetzner, but it may not yet reflect the dropouts.
There are five ways to help, as laid out on the sponsorship page of Gentoo’s wiki, with preference being given to supporters who share the project’s vision of software that respects choice and stays open to user-driven changes.
The first way is to accept donated machines for the project’s hosting locations in the US. They are not asking for much; anything good enough to handle server-focused tasks in today’s time is a good offering for them to use.
Next is Colocation, a type of physical hosting. The sponsor would provide rack space, power, and connectivity, while Gentoo finds the hardware to put in it. Capacity outside the US is their most urgent need at the moment, though offers from the US are welcome too.
Third are virtual machines, with a minimum of 2 vCPUs, 4GB of RAM, and 25GB of storage. The project says that it is leaning more on the cloud wherever it can, but many of its services are monolithic, and that Kubernetes would suit them poorly.
The fourth way is full-package hosted physical servers. The wiki gives two examples: a root server like the ones Hetzner offers, or a sponsor’s older or unused servers with Gentoo getting full remote access.
In that second case, the sponsor would still own and manage the hardware, whereas Gentoo would take care of the operating system and remote management, only asking for advance notice before any migration events.
The last is plain old money. Any donated funds would go toward paying for colocation and hosting.
A call to act
Gentoo is far from the only project that needs this kind of backing.
Take LVFS, the firmware update service for Linux. It leaned heavily on the Linux Foundation and Red Hat, with Framework and the Open Source Firmware Foundation pitching in $10,000 a year.
Then Lenovo and Dell joined at the Premier tier, at $100,000 a year each, along with HP and NVIDIA, who followed soon after. I would call that a win for LVFS and a sign that sponsors are out there for projects that go looking.
Maybe your organization has spare rack space, or you have money lying around and want it to do some good. Either way, someone has to host the servers behind projects like this, and Gentoo’s infrastructure team is available at infra@gentoo.org for any infrastructure sponsorship-related queries.
Gentoo is probably the most customizable of the Linux distros, as you can compile from source, adjust C compiler flags to optimize application speed, remove compiler level features if you don’t want/need them, and they support a LOT of computer architectures. Not to mention the Gentoo Wiki is a gem of documentation that surpasses (imho) even the Arch Wiki.
It’s potentially the best Linux distro for tinkerers up there with Arch Linux and NixOS.
Eeh, tbh it has a lot of infoes but it’s poorly organized and structured
Yeah, fair. Again, it’s imho, that the Gentoo wiki still surpasses the Arch wiki (emphasis on humble opinion).
All that considered, it would be a considerable tragedy to lose Gentoo as a distribution in the Linux ecosystem. It offers something no other Linux distro does. Namely complete customization surpassed only by LFS (i.e. Linux From Scratch).
On a bit of a tangent, I personally think the recent popularity of AI points to not the superiority of AI/LLM utility, but rather to the enshittefication of modern search/documentation.
I think the Gentoo wiki, for all its flaws, is still a genuinely important part of the online documentation of how everything works. Sure, it’s terse, its verbose. But after the summary, don’t you eventually come to the thought “sure, but why? Why run that command? What does that mean? What does that ultimately do?” I’m not saying the Gentoo wiki answers this (ultimately this boils down to a CS/Math question), but still, the deeper question and the slightly deeper answer matters. It’s important that is documented, publicly somewhere. It is important you shouldn’t have to query an LLM to get that answer. Any wiki is better than some corporately gate kept LLM answer.
Hence, why I still think while imperfect, the Gentoo wiki is important to maintain.
It is my hope, that while perhaps you may not agree with my humble opinion, that you might at least sympathize with my view.