• novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It’s not using the same hardware, this seems to use a special compression chip.

    To me this feels more like the benefits of a CPU or GPU upgrade. Things run faster, but not due to software improvements. When people talk about things getting optimized due to the high RAM prices, I think most people are referring to software improvements.

    • sekki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There is no mention of any extra hardware here though. The article even suggests this to benefit existing hardware like the steam deck.

      • novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        In another comment, I posted a link to the CRAM presentation that mentioned a chip.

        This article also mentions some hardware:

        Because CRAM is stored in RAM and treated as RAM, with full cacheline/byte access, it can be accessed in a read-only fashion with little delay; just the cost of hardware-offloaded compression.

        I don’t think it would say that if they meant the CPU was doing the compression.

        • sekki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Ah I see. It might not be a requirement though. In the case that the numbers are given with hardware offloaded compression it might just be slower when running on CPU. But I guess time will tell.