Maybe the generally accepted definition of “a couple of things” changed throughout the years. I am not exaggerating when I say I’ve never heard it used to refer to exactly two things, neither in English nor in my native language where there exists an equivalent phrase. But if you say that you have heard it that way, then so be it. Not to say you’re old or anything, but English did change a little bit since 65+ years ago. I don’t really understand where all the people arguing against a contemporary dictionary came from but it is quite entertaining :D
I’m not arguing that “a couple of things” can never be two, but that its pedantic to expect everyone to think it means “exactly two”, when clearly that isn’t the case, as proven by dictionaries. Language changes, and it’s ridiculous to stand your ground and say “No! ‘Couple’ means two, so ‘a couple of’ must also mean two of!”. It’s like redirecting a river with traffic signs, you can try but it’s not gonna change how the phrase is used in modern, contemporary English.
Honestly for a moment I thought I was taking crazy pills in this thread. I had to show this to a couple people to make sure I’m not completely out of touch, but they all confirmed that “a couple of” is usually more than two. Idk why people on here are so argumentative about this :D
And yeah, atomicblocks was just fighting ghosts. Idk what they thought this was about, but they just didn’t seem to understand what was being discussed. Oh well, just another pointless argument on the internet
Maybe the generally accepted definition of “a couple of things” changed throughout the years. I am not exaggerating when I say I’ve never heard it used to refer to exactly two things, neither in English nor in my native language where there exists an equivalent phrase. But if you say that you have heard it that way, then so be it. Not to say you’re old or anything, but English did change a little bit since 65+ years ago. I don’t really understand where all the people arguing against a contemporary dictionary came from but it is quite entertaining :D
I’m not arguing that “a couple of things” can never be two, but that its pedantic to expect everyone to think it means “exactly two”, when clearly that isn’t the case, as proven by dictionaries. Language changes, and it’s ridiculous to stand your ground and say “No! ‘Couple’ means two, so ‘a couple of’ must also mean two of!”. It’s like redirecting a river with traffic signs, you can try but it’s not gonna change how the phrase is used in modern, contemporary English.
Honestly for a moment I thought I was taking crazy pills in this thread. I had to show this to a couple people to make sure I’m not completely out of touch, but they all confirmed that “a couple of” is usually more than two. Idk why people on here are so argumentative about this :D
And yeah, atomicblocks was just fighting ghosts. Idk what they thought this was about, but they just didn’t seem to understand what was being discussed. Oh well, just another pointless argument on the internet