• ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    What part of simply asking her husband to be involved with their child made you think she’s shit? People change over time. He may have chosen a different trajectory from hers

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Same part as what makes you guys thing she would. Basically boils down to, we have no idea what they are like!

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        We have one data point: him attempting to shirk his familial responsibility after being asked. It provides some small level of support for the stance you’re arguing against.

        It does not support your contrarian response at all.

        So, no. It doesn’t boil down to the same thing.

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          It does, if you choose not to understand that, no problem. We have no idea what the next response from the wife could be. “Wow, that’s an amazing idea honey!” is just as likely considering she married this man.

          • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Reread what I said.

            Understand that you need to INVENT something that isn’t part of the evidence to support your position. That is not the same as overeager extrapolation from what IS available.

            • warm@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              Hivemind goes crazy. You fabricated that in the same way I did. There’s no telling what the wife reaction would be, so you can infer anything from the tweet.

              Nobody is denying this: him attempting to shirk his familial responsibility after being asked

              The point you are arguing is that his wife would leave him from things like this, which is assuming that his wife would object to his “familial responsibility avoidance”, which is the same as assuming she would not object to it. You are inventing the wife having a negative reaction, I am saying the wife could have a positive reaction.

              Also, you invented something first, pot calling the kettle black.

              He may have chosen a different trajectory from hers

                • warm@kbin.earth
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  So, because you have played yourself, you are now throwing out wild accusations. Got it.

              • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                which is the same as assuming she would not object to it.

                Whenever a law says “a reasonable person,” my strategy is to drag them into an infinite fractal of technicalities and possible exceptions because I don’t know what reasonable means.

                • warm@kbin.earth
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Just because you would like one situation to be reality and think that because it is the most reasonable, doesnt mean it is the only possible reality.

                  Think of all the famous pieces of shit that exist, they have spouses. Why? Because they are also pieces of shit.

                  • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    You need more evidence for that, mate.

                    I’m saying she would leave him because I would leave his ass. If she wouldn’t, then I feel sorry for her. Truly pitiful.