Even if it works despite being AI slop that’s been developed in a mere 4 days (?) and somehow has all these contributors, I’m not sure I agree with the idea.

It’s cool that they went with Rust for it, but I would have much preferred if all that effort went towards improving GIMP and existing open formats.

If it works then I guess it’s the same end result at the end of the day, but it would suck if GIMP doesn’t end up being the one to put a nail on Photoshop’s coffin after all these years of serious development by humans.

Edit: I already see the kneejerk dislikes coming, I’m just interested in starting a conversation about the idea of it, I also dislike the fact that it’s AI slop as I already implied. I’d appreciate joining the conversation instead of dislike bombing with no argument.

  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It would be okay, if it wasn’t Ai. I think using LLMs cannot be guaranteed to be a clean room implementation.

    • AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      Let’s grab our popcorn and watch Adobe fight AI companies on this. Because if this isn’t legal, then what does that say for everything else generated by AI?

      • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeah we could be a court ruling away from a lot of AI usage being considered illegal. The burden of proof rests on Adobe though. They will have to show examples of their source code being extremely similar I think.