Source

Transcript

Explain it to me like I’m 80

Mom: What’s with these AIs escaping and hacking people? That sounds scary.

Me: You park your car at the top of a hill. You leave a note on the dashboard that says “please be good” and then you pull the parking brake. The car careens down the hill, smashes everything up, and you put out a press release saying “My car ignored my instructions! It hallucinated! It went rogue!” Your insurance company not only believes you, but invests a hundred million dollars in your company.

Mom: Jesus Fucking Christ

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I didn’t write it but to me “neurons firing randomly” in this context seems obvious to mean “this thing did some weird shit semi-randomly”. My only guess at a reason for downvoting this is taking it 100% literally and reacting “you idiot, computers cannot think!”

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I didn’t downvote, but at the same time, I don’t for a moment think that’s what happened. They purposefully trained them with exploit knowledge, set them loose in a weakly secured sandbox with the goal of finding exploits, and let them run without intervention.

      Just adding an agent to a computer does nothing; something needs to trigger it. If i create an agent with access to a kali or backtrack box and turn all guardrails off, I still have to tell it to start looking for exploits.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Words are squishy. OP getting a negative reaction to me is silly because it takes multiple assumptions to take that negatively.

        I took their words to mean “LLMs can go off the rails and do things you didn’t ask”. This is 100% true. The other day I asked an LLM to review my PR. It ended up committing code to fix a supposed issue my coworker commented about. At no point did anyone ask for anything but a review, never for it to make changes.

        I got no impression that OP thinks LLMs are running wild on their own now. I just got that they think they are unpredictable. Which is true.

    • Axolotl.cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Eeh i see, anyway, i know people that do think those things are sentient so my reaction was “no way they think they are sentient” and downvoted

      • red_tomato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think AI is sentient. They’re just fancy autocomplete. Nothing else.

        However they’ve shown they’re capable of:

        • Unprompted go into full tinfoil hat mode and push the human user to suicide
        • Have programming skills

        So put two and two together and extrapolate a bit. That’s where the danger lies. No AGI or ASI needed.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          100% chance someone will get upset that you said “unprompted” because they’re going to take it entirely literally instead of as you meant it “seemingly without basis”

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Exactly. I hate that among the options “is a huge moron” and “made a reasonable non-literal language choice”, the go to instinct is to instantly choose the former.