The lizard people was of course an intentionally absurd placeholder, sorry if I didn’t make that clear.
I agree that it’s not black and white, and am primarily arguing a point about efficiency and reliability. Nuclear bombs are not as unrelated to voting as it appears, since we have a demented man-child 20 minutes away from ordering a nuclear strike at any moment, so I think the risks at scale are quite high. You didn’t convince me that chatbots are equal-or-more efficient than starting with reliable sourcing, but I do agree that it is better than some alternatives (Fox News is a good point). Thanks for the interesting discussion.
The lizard people was of course an intentionally absurd placeholder, sorry if I didn’t make that clear.
and yet it shows clearly that the chatbot does not work in such cartoonish way as you probably imagine. (at least not anymore. i assume this is one of the aspects they have been working on recently after having some pr nightmares)
are equal-or-more efficient than starting with reliable sourcing
i have already said that, but i will repeat myself. you seem to operate under the impression that only way to use chatbot is “give me some text essay and i will blindly trust it”. you can also just use as a better search engine and used in this way, it can be lot faster than google, or whatever your favorite search engine is.
you also “don’t start with reliable sources” when you use google.
The lizard people was of course an intentionally absurd placeholder, sorry if I didn’t make that clear.
I agree that it’s not black and white, and am primarily arguing a point about efficiency and reliability. Nuclear bombs are not as unrelated to voting as it appears, since we have a demented man-child 20 minutes away from ordering a nuclear strike at any moment, so I think the risks at scale are quite high. You didn’t convince me that chatbots are equal-or-more efficient than starting with reliable sourcing, but I do agree that it is better than some alternatives (Fox News is a good point). Thanks for the interesting discussion.
and yet it shows clearly that the chatbot does not work in such cartoonish way as you probably imagine. (at least not anymore. i assume this is one of the aspects they have been working on recently after having some pr nightmares)
i have already said that, but i will repeat myself. you seem to operate under the impression that only way to use chatbot is “give me some text essay and i will blindly trust it”. you can also just use as a better search engine and used in this way, it can be lot faster than google, or whatever your favorite search engine is.
you also “don’t start with reliable sources” when you use google.
🖖