• JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Assuming people get electric vehicles when their combustion cars reach end of life and not just trading in a four year old SUV for its electric variant, the I think it is.

    Ignoring the ideal wherein privately owned vehicles decrease over time, of course. Continued development of EVs will be a benefit in terms of battery technology and motor efficiency, among other things.

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      The efficiency of an EV SUV will never be anywhere near the efficiency of an (electric) bicycle. Motor and battery efficiency also improves for bicycles. The bicycle will always need only a fraction of the resources, in materials, electricity and occupied space.

      • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yes I agree. I didn’t imply an SUV is somehow better than a few bikes. My comment wasn’t an argument for cars nor continuing car dependancy, only touching on a benefit from their manufacture - negatives often do have silver linings.

        In a non car dependant future, I’d still expect the buses and ambulances and whatnot else to be electric.