• potustheplant@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Uhm no? There are more than a few use cases that require a mobile set up for demos for example but that you’d also want to use in a desk setting. For example, architects or sw dev.

    Which is still enough for almost all sane use cases.

    Like 2 4k60 monitors and literally nothing else? You have a very conservative opinion of what a “sane” use case is. Not to mention that lots of USB-C cable certification is a mess so not even getting the cable is simple (or cheap).

    • fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Show me one architect that is actually dragging along two external 4k displays with their laptop.

      If you are a professional with specific needs buy a specific laptop. Frankly there are more than enough laptops that have more ports if that’s what you need. Except even in your example you don’t even need more ports because you can just use the second USB4 port.

      • potustheplant@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You misunderstood. They use those monitors when actually working in a stationary place with their desktop setup. However, it’s very common to then have to go to your client’s office to show them said work or discuss future steps. At which point having multiple port options comes in handy if you have to plug in to a tv, monitor or projector.

        You can’t seriously consider asking for hdmi and displayport on a laptop a “specific need”.

              • potustheplant@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Why move the goalpost though? I’m not narrowing it down to a specific user in a specific setting. I’m just saying that more flexibility == more better.

                Why would you make up a specific scenario to justify getting a inferior product (from a usability standpoint) than we used to?

                • fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 hours ago

                  That’s my whole point; No, more ports isn’t more better. If you don’t need them they’re just more cost, more holes where water/debris can get into the machine, and more wrong holes to plug the charger into. If you do need them, then buy a machine that has them - there are plenty.

                  • potustheplant@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    If you don’t need them they’re just more cost

                    Yeah, tell me another joke. the cost is negligible. Literally from cents to a few dollars for the manufacturer.

                    more holes where water/debris can get into the machine

                    This literally never happened to me or anyone I know.

                    more wrong holes to plug the charger into

                    If you plug in your usb-c/barrel jack charger into an ethernet/hdmi/displayport input, you deserve to have a broken laptop xD

                    If you do need them, then buy a machine that has them - there are plenty.

                    Not really true, but ok. Keep on preaching for companies that screw over consumers :)