• testaccount372920@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I assume they mean stuff like image descriptions that you can add in Microslop Word (don’t know about LibreOffice). It’s quite a neat feature that wouldn’t work with markdown (might work with LaTeX), because these image descriptions are not visible to someone reading a document.

    • Zagorath@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Image descriptions are a thing in markdown. Images are inserted into markdown documents with this syntax:

      ![alt text](url)
      
        • Zagorath@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Both Lemmy and Piefed support it, though weirdly unlike the alt text field when submitting an image post, this syntax only adds alt text, so only screen readers will see it—users can’t view the text on hover.

    • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Correct, accessibility also differentiates between titles and content, to better assist readers who use a screen reader.

      • Zagorath@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I replied to the other user showing how markdown image descriptions work. Titles are added with hashes.

        # title
        ## subtitle
        
        Text
        
        ### sub-sub title
        
        Etc.
        
        • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Screen reader should pick that up.

          It’s a bit trickier in LaTeX (depending on layout), given they convert to an untagged pdf by default using pdftex. For defaults such as section/subsection etc I think some auto-tagging has been added, but my memory is not great.

          Issues crop up when you need to hack something (e.g. indenting parts of a proof using the quote environment to aid readability, creating more complex tables, or just using coloured text to indicate element relations), and here manual tagging is a must!