return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoCyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the UStechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square116linkfedilinkarrow-up1442arrow-down15cross-posted to: pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
arrow-up1437arrow-down1external-linkCyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the UStechcrunch.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square116linkfedilinkcross-posted to: pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoInterlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.
minus-squareplz1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·2 days agoI was arguing with the point of “repeatedly” being a determining factor for having to have this device. It’s not reality, once is enough.
minus-squarehardcoreufo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoYes, once is enough. Repeatedly should get you banned from driving.
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoWhen you consider that most people get away with a crime dozens of times at least before getting caught, then yes being caught once is enough.
Interlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.
I was arguing with the point of “repeatedly” being a determining factor for having to have this device. It’s not reality, once is enough.
Yes, once is enough. Repeatedly should get you banned from driving.
When you consider that most people get away with a crime dozens of times at least before getting caught, then yes being caught once is enough.