A new poll shows Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Talarico leading Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton ® by 5 points over a month before the November midterm elections.

The Texas Public Opinion Research (TPOR) poll released Friday showed Talarico with 49 percent support from voters and Paxton with 44 percent support, with 3 percent saying they are undecided. This new poll is the second in a monthly series of polling results released by TPOR. Last month’s poll showed Talarico’s ahead by 6 points, 48-42.

Independent voters favor Talarico by double digits, 58-26, with 5 percent who say they are undecided. Paxton holds the lead among white voters and voters 55 years and above. Talarico leads among Latino voters, Black voters, voters under 55, college-educated voters, men and women, the poll stated.

      • funkreddit@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I think it’s all fake news for dems to get complacent. Just another dirty trick from the Rs

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          All of the polling institutions are pretty aligned this time around, so that kind of discredits the “fake news” argument. Too many independent sources are saying the same thing.

          That said, polls are based on historical data. And polls might not do a good job of trying to account for the abnormal fuckery that has been happening this cycle. Off cycle gerrymandering, purges of democratic leaning voters, scares about mail-in voting, etc.

          People shouldn’t assume this is a lock. People need to show up in high numbers.

          • Sir G'kar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            People also forget that most campaigns want to be able to claim they are ahead in the polls. Strong poll numbers can lead to the bandwagon effect, while trailing poll numbers can cause people to give up.

            Too many people remember Hillary losing in 2016 but fail to consider the specific context of her being an unpopular candidate. Believing that your side is going to win isn’t normally a reason to stay home, unless you have some objection to the turd sandwich your side nominated.

            So be encouraged by good polls, don’t be discouraged by bad polls, and then get off your and vote no matter what the polls say.

            • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              41 minutes ago

              IMHO, Clinton v Trump is also the perfect example of normies not understanding how statistics and probability works.

              Trump had a nearly 30% chance of winning. That’s a legit possibility of winning. If powerball had a 30% chance of winning, everyone would be running to buy a ticket.

              People saw Clinton at 70% and seemed to think that was a lock. 70% odd isn’t a 100% chance of winning. It’s 70%.

              • starik@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 minutes ago

                That was just the FiveThirtyEight model. Most other models had Clinton in the high 90’s.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I don’t understand this thought process. Aren’t Republicans the ones always pushing the “don’t bother voting, you can’t win” rhetoric? Seems like this would have the opposite affect to me.

      • darvocet@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The statement is made because in the past there was a thought that only fucking idiots would elect Trump and so people protest voted or stayed home. Polls showed him losing.

        So now polls mean nothing. What the media says means nothing. Get your fucking ass to the polling location and vote. In person.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Isn’t “We can win! Get to the polls and vote!” a more effective message?

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I think “we will actually represent you instead of billionaires and Israel” is a better message. See: the wild success of Mamdani. But for $ome reason the democrat$ ju$t can’t $eem to manage that.

              • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 minutes ago

                Yes it absolutely does. So many people don’t bother to vote because they see the options as two sides of the same coin.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I mean there are a bazillion things tried with Beto. Just because he didn’t win doesn’t mean zero of them worked.

              • darvocet@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                When someone says “Don’t listen to the polls, get out and vote” it’s because we lived an experience where polls were wrong and people didn’t vote. It doesn’t matter what message is best. If you are thinking of not voting because the polls show candidate is a shoe in - then you arent paying attention.