House Democrats are preparing a vast oversight agenda, with investigations of President Donald Trump, his family and his administration if the party sweeps control of the chamber from Republicans in the November elections.

The undertaking is as robust as it is daunting, spanning several House committees. With majority power comes bigger budgets and staff, and the ability to investigate, subpoena and potentially course-correct what the Democrats say are widespread corruption and abuses of power. Impeachment of the Republican president and Cabinet officials is not off the table.

“There is a cost to the American people of the out-of-control corruption,” said Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York, who is in line to become House speaker if Democrats win control at the Capitol.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    10 hours ago

    it shoudnt be a fucking option. it should the entire fucking agenda.

    you fucking fucks are not fucking playing the same game anymore wake the fuck up

    • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Impeachment does nothing. He’s already been impeached. Twice.

      Unless they want to demonstrate to the People and the world that their democracy is broken for a third time, it has limited use.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        impeachment is required for removal by congress.

        theoretically, congress (specifically, the senate) could remove him after impeachement. they wont, of course, but impeachment is required by the house before the senate can remove him.

        • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          That’s a very benign thing to say. So you have a good recipe for beignets?

        • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Probably to placate everyone? They are acknowledging that it is deserved, but they are also hinting that it will go nowhere and be a waste of time.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Well, then that should set our expectations on what they mean by “oversight” - placation that will go nowhere

            • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Ya, you’re right. Oversight is exactly what it sounds like. It doesn’t matter what they uncover or expose if the senate is still loyal to their president.

    • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If you can’t get 2/3 of the senate to convict, impeachment is so much political theater. Democrats will be quite lucky to take a majority in the senate, 67 is theoretically possible but not realistic, I don’t think, and unless a lot changes quickly there won’t be many republican defections. Not that it’s useless, because impeachment proceedings are another time sink for the executive branch, but it’s foolish to put eggs into that basket because it’s a broken mechanism.

      The more important function of Congress over the next two years will be the stoppage of rubber stamping of Trump-friendly legislation, subpoenaing executive officials and forcing them to choose between testifying under oath and risking contempt (and public reporting of same, for whatever that’s worth), and investigating and reporting on the crimes that Trump and his administration have committed over the past two years.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Are they going to do anything about the people who ignore the subpoena or just let that slide like last time?

      • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It is absolutely not “theater,” though if you don’t understand the process I could see how it could be tempting to think that

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah but what about my rage at very complicated things that seem super simple to me? How will I blame the Democrats for that?