Trans journalist Erin Reed has published a list of Democratic midterm candidates with anti-trans records, and the question she is forcing is one the party would rather not answer: if trans voters keep rewarding Democrats who harm them, what signal does that send? The calculation is real, the stakes are high, and there is no clean answer.

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I just don’t get the obsession with transgender people. What did they ever do other than just wanting to be left alone? Did a bunch of them bomb a bunch orphanages with burning puppies running out of the flaming building?

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They’re an easy target because they’re a small minority and it’s easy to convince people who aren’t educated in the subject that they’re doing harm by letting men into women’s spaces and making children change gender

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They’re a pawn that bigots like to use to rile their base and distract from other issues. With enough enthusiasm, a concerted effort can make about anything the enemy to rally against. It’s mostly fear mongering, but also has a serious detrimental effect to those being targeted.

      • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Lyndon B. Johnson: “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

        Nonwhite, trans, gay, feminist, non-Christian, furry, etc – substitute at will for the latest boogeyman.

      • watson@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Exactly. They’ll take any group and demonize the “other” just to have someone they can point fingers at. It’s all distraction. Sadly, trans people are the “other” of the moment. Historically, this shit doesn’t end well, and when they’re done with trans people they’ll “other” another group.

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      There is a large contingent of voters that are deeply religious and hate them. They are trying to appeal to those voters. America is still one of the most religious countries in the world.

      • Sunflier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 hours ago

        There is a large contingent of voters that are deeply religious and hate them.

        This is what I am asking about. Why? What is the bug up religious people’s asses about transgender people.

        • Kirp123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Their argument usually is that God doesn’t make mistakes and trying to change the gender you’re born with is just flaunting him or something. It’s not a rational argument, their book or their pastor says it’s unnatural and they follow like the little sheep their are.