• schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why would there be security checks at train stations? I know those are a thing in some countries, but this never made any sense to me. They aren’t where I live; a train can’t be driven into buildings and if something does explode on them (exactly as possible as in any crowd), the train will simply stop, not fall from the sky.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      A similar number of people would be injured/die from a plane explosion as a train explosion.

      Your arguments against no security checks apply equally to trains and planes (and busses).

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not really because an explosion on a train or bus doesn’t cause the entire vehicle to crash into the ground, only to stop. An explosion on a train or bus is going to kill or injure people in its radius of impact, but people sitting far away from it (granted: not many of those on a bus, but very much so on a long train) won’t be injured. On a plane, if that plane stops operating mid-flight, even people on the other end of the plane from the explosion are unlikely to survive.

          • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            OK, “won’t be injured” wasn’t exactly true; but they are still in a lot less danger than someone in the same situation on a plane. A train or bus can stop anywhere on its route if there is a dangerous situation, a plane cannot, so in my mind it makes a lot of sense that there are security checks before boarding a plane, but not when boarding a train or bus.