• Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Also, if there’s a problem with a train, the whole rail goes down. If there’s a problem with an airplane, the other planes have a whole lot of sky they can still use.

    That’s not how rail works.

    There absolutely are passing places where a train can hop onto the left track and then back again, or just a long stretch of an extra track going parallel to the main route where either the faulty train can sit and wait for repairs, or the working trains can jump around the faulty one.

    Source: living in a country that actually has a working passenger railway system.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      So only 4000 miles of grade-separated high-speed rail (and all the infrastructure and private property easements, divisions, etc required for the construction) just to connect just these 2 cities? No problem.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You don’t connect just those two cities, mate. You connect them as the main artery and then do split-offs to other areas. Or, even better, you weave the main railway between major cities East-to-West to connect them directly.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        What are you talking about? Chicago-NYC are maybe 1200 km, perfectly within HSR distance and definitely within Maglev distance. The two urban areas are also huge enough to support such a thing, especially as there are a few mid sized urban areas in between.