• Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    A national strike would probably be more palatable if there were trusted community organizations that could help the most vulnerable who can’t go without pay, even for short periods. It doesn’t just have to be cash they distribute, in-kind goods or services would be useful too.

    This is what people mean when they say voting isn’t enough to make meaningful change. Get to know your neighbors and take care of each other. The state is less scary when you have solidarity.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The German revolutions saw those things just taken and given to the people.

      How long do you think a given Walmart could support people for?

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Farmers were paid with capital and items siezed from banks and merchants.

          The just in time month’s worth of rice for a family can last 4 families a week.

          It just has to support people who can’t support themselves long enough to set up proper supply lines.

          • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            While this is an important topic, my original comment was simply about strike support. I think a huge barrier for people is how daunting direct action can be. If people can support each other through strikes and other acts of solidarity, planning for more impactful disruptions will be more manageable.