• vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I was moreso referring to work from home mandates, and putting in incentives out to reduce the amount of trucks on the road stuff like that. I legit don’t see what relevance fuedalism has in this situation since that’s basically irrelevant to things like price controls.

    • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      I was moreso referring to work from home mandates, and putting in incentives out to reduce the amount of trucks on the road stuff like that. I legit don’t see what relevance fuedalism has in this situation since that’s basically irrelevant to things like price controls.

      I see you did as well in reading and spelling as you did in civics.

      • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Three dumb shit derogatory comments yet you still haven’t explained anything. Are you sure you don’t need a civics class? LOL

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Nah, just have a brain fuck of a migraine, I’d rather be safe with superfluous apostrophes than fuck up a sentence completely.

        Regardless nothing about what I said is impossible, unwarranted, or unprecedented. Frankly it’d be better to take proactive measures to reduce fuel prices or at least reduce fuel consumption than risk economic collapse because no one can due interstate trade outside of the rails which would bottleneck badly. Don’t think anyone wants the fuel crisis from the 70s back, but we may not have much of a choice given current circumstances.