The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced it is launching a drinking water quality study to look for traces of abortion pills mifepristone and misoprostol for the first time.

Anti-abortion activists, attorneys general, and lawmakers have been lobbying for the agency to carry the study for years.

Researchers at the agency will collect water samples “from several locations in different metropolitan areas” and test them for thousands of drugs, pesticides and synthetic chemicals, including mifepristone, misoprostol, and multiple types of “forever chemicals,” according to a description of the study.

    • TrollAccount69@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a good thing they’re planning to do a scientific study then, that methodology claims to be able to root out bias.

        • TrollAccount69@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s the same as before rfk. It’s the same people by and large as before rfk.

          Surely you can’t be suggesting a department which could conduct perfectly reasonable research before is suddenly unable to do so now?

          How can a study on the presence of thousands of different prescription drugs and other chemicals in drinking water be bad in your eyes?

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            No it’s not.

            Sorta. Capable, possibly. Willing, not at all.

            The study itself, mm sorta here nor there. What they do with the results is the issue.

            • TrollAccount69@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m gonna go out on a limb and speak for the average American when I say that knowing if there are prescription drugs and chemicals in my drinking water isn’t “sorta here nor there”.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                Uh huh, then I’d say you like the average American have a critical thinking issue. Just because it sounds altruistic doesn’t mean it is and assuming that to be the case in this admin is batshit crazy.

                • TrollAccount69@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I dont think it’s altruistic, just something everyone wants to know.

                  People you disagree with or don’t want in power can do things that help you.

                  • Madison420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    That’s altruistic purpose bud. Ie unselfish concern.

                    Assuming that to be the case is crazy. The admin and the hhs head specifically do not believe in science, assuming it’ll be scientific is just amusing.

                  • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    People you disagree with or don’t want in power can do things that help you.

                    And this can lead to dangerous outcomes.