SYDNEY, Sept 17 (Reuters) - Australia is considering barring the use of camera-equipped smart glasses in government workplaces due to privacy and security concerns, in what it said could be the first ban of its kind.
The government will separately convene a roundtable of the country’s biggest employers, including Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab, Commonwealth Bank (CBA.AX), opens new tab, telecoms firm Telstra (TLS.AX), opens new tab and energy company AGL (AGL.AX), opens new tab as it consults on a set of guidelines for AI in the workplace.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said it was important that Australia, which last year became the first place in the world to ban social media for teens, put the “right protections in place as technology evolves”.
“I am proud that Australia is setting the world standard for digital safety,” he said in a statement on Thursday.
While smart glasses have been lauded by some sections of the community such as the visually impaired, there have been growing concerns globally that the devices can be used to covertly record and photograph people without their consent.
Norway’s capital Oslo banned the glasses in schools last month, and the federal government is considering regulating their use. England and Wales have prohibited the use of Meta (META.O), opens new tab smart glasses in courts.
Katy Gallagher, Australia’s minister for public service, said she had asked the public service commission for advice on whether smart glasses capable of recording should be prohibited in government workplaces.
“Smart glasses can raise legitimate privacy and security concerns, particularly because of their ability to record and capture information, and we need clear and consistent guidance for public servants,” she said.
Companies selling smart glasses are also facing legal challenges from the private sector. A German advocacy group has filed a criminal complaint against Meta and others involved in selling the Meta devices, citing privacy laws.
it is only a privacy and security concern when it ’ s the ones at the top . us peasants don ’ t need privacy , clearly .
No! Politicians should be obligated to wear them, so the people can see who’s bribing them!
this is the only acceptable use case
On the one hand, I’d love to see them banned anywhere, on the other hand of all places, their best use is greater transparency in areas there is legitimate public interest
Of all the possible places, this is where I think its use is ok. If my tax dollars are paying for it, it should be public.
Just ban them everywhere.
[padme meme] and everywhere else, right? 😅
Padme
oops, true! i’ve corrected my first post
Gee think long and hard about this.




