• ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    A whole lot of people die in a total collapse, and there’s no guarantee that what comes after would be better (in fact, odds are it’d be significantly worse). Accelerationism is betting that you can outlive mass famine, street gangs, and water insecurity long enough to get to the military juntas and opportunistic invading forces. All while the biggest stockpile of weapons and military hardware in history is just sitting around for anyone to walk off with, and any country that might be inclined to help altruistically is also collapsing because the world’s largest economic driver just went belly-up, or being attacked by the opportunists who got in and stole the keys to the nukes early.

    Total collapse is a worst case scenario; not just for Americans, but for the world as a whole, and for multiple generations.

    Always vote for not-collapse if you’re given a choice.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Fair point. Though it’s also betting that the better parts of our society can outlive all of that, so I think my point still stands.

        That kind of species-level nihilism (annihilism? Suicidalism?) is always scary to me. I don’t like thinking about it, so I didn’t consider it.